Critic Terry Teachout reveals the drama and music that moved him the most as a young man, and which is the more personal art form for him.
Question: What plays and music did you most admire when you were young?rn
Terry Teachout: The first play I ever saw, I was in junior high school, was a high school production of Noel Coward's "Blithe Spirit," which seemed to me absolutely magical. I had never seen people performing on a stage before. It was so different from television and movies. Of course, I didn't know at the age of 12, or however old I was, that I was going to end up being the drama critic of the newspaper, but the experience of seeing people on the stage, sharing the air that you breathe, being part of your world instead of people on a flat screen was very powerful for me and I know it pushed me in the direction of wanting to be a performer of some kind.rn
I loved music from earliest childhood; from as long as I can remember. The house was full of records. My father had lots of old records; 78's, big bands, Jazz, that's how I first heard Armstrong really, and all the other kinds of music I ended up writing about and ultimately playing. I became a professional musician and played all kinds of music. I played Bluegrass, I played Classical Music, and for many years I played Jazz.rn
But it was the records. There wasn't a lot of live music that you could hear where I came from, which was a small town in southeast Missouri. There was an occasional concert that came through, but basically, my experience of music, and largely of the arts, came through television more than anything else. Back in the '60's, when I was a boy, you could turn on Ed Sullivan on Sunday night and see ballet companies and Jazz and Classical musicians along with ventriloquists and people who spun plates on the ends of poles. And I think the fact that television brought you all of these experiences on a kind of plane of equality had a real effect on how I ultimately came to view the arts because for me, all the arts are one. They're all -- music, drama, and film, and painting, they are different ways of trying to do the same thing, and I've always experienced them on this plane of equality. Really, from the time I started writing about the arts, I've wanted to write about all of the arts. I wanted to have the opportunity to do that and finally I got it. Now I write about whatever interests me.rn
Question: How did you transition from performance to criticism?rn
Terry Teachout: I was writing throughout the time that I was performing. I started – I edited my school newspaper, I did the things that a young writer does. And they were parallel tracks for me. Criticism was simply an opportunity that came up when I was in college to do some reviewing and I found that I liked it. I found that I liked the idea of being able to communicate your own enthusiasm, your own excitement, to try to get people to come see something that you saw and maybe see in it what you saw. Somewhere along the way, I came to the conclusion that I was a better writer than I was a musician, I was just better at it, and I decided that that was what I wanted to do.rn
Question: Is music or theater criticism more personal for you?rn
Terry Teachout: Neither. All the arts are personal and important to me. Obviously, somewhere deep within me there is the fact that I have been a musician and it's as though that is my first language. But, I’ve been writing about other things for so long that the thing that excites me the most is the thing I'm going to see tonight.
Recorded on November 17, 2009
Interviewed by Austin Allen