Skip to content
Starts With A Bang

The First Clock In America Failed, And It Helped Revolutionize Physics

The pendulum didn’t tick right when they brought it here: the start of a fascinating story.

For nearly three full centuries, the most accurate way that humanity kept track of time was through the pendulum clock. From its initial development in the 17th century until the invention of quartz timepieces in the 1920s, pendulum clocks became staples of household life, enabling people to organize their schedules according to a universally agreed upon standard. Initially invented in the Netherlands by Christian Huygens all the way back in 1656, their early designs were quickly refined to greatly increase their precision.

But when the first pendulum clock was brought to the Americas, something bizarre happened. The clock, which had worked perfectly well at keeping accurate time in Europe, could be synchronized with known astronomical phenomena, like sunset/sunrise and moonset/moonrise. But after only a week or two in the Americas, it was clear that the clock wasn’t keeping time properly. The first clock in America was a complete failure, but that’s only the beginning of a story that would revolutionize our understanding of the physics of planet Earth.

The very first drawing of a concept for a pendulum clock was by Galileo Galilei, which sought to leverage the uniform period of a swinging pendulum to create a working timekeeping machine. The device was never completed, either by Galileo or his son, and the first pendulum clock was constructed in 1656 by Christiaan Huygens. (DE AGOSTINI VIA GETTY IMAGES)

For thousands of years, scientists had no better method for keeping time than the ancient sundial. But starting in the early 1600s, Galileo’s investigations into the swinging pendulum — and, in particular, his observation that the period of a pendulum was determined solely by its length — led to the idea that a pendulum could theoretically be used as a clock. Galileo discussed the idea in 1637, and although he died in 1642, the idea lived on.

In 1656, Christiaan Huygens invented the very first working pendulum clock, which was both primitive and revolutionary in a number of ways. Over the next few decades, refinements were made that improved the pendulum clock even further, including:

  • shortening the swing so that it only occurred for narrow angles, increasing its accuracy,
  • increasing the length of the pendulum and putting a heavy mass on the end, which increased the clock’s longevity,
  • standardizing a length of 0.994 meters for the pendulum, which meant that each “swing” from one side to the other lasted exactly one second,
  • and the addition of a minute hand, as the clocks were now accurate enough so that fractions of an hour, down to the minute, were now meaningful quantities to discuss.
The front view (L) and side/schematic view (R) of the first pendulum clock ever built, in 1656/7, which was designed by Christiaan Huygens and built by Saloman Coster. The drawings come from Huygens’ 1658 treatise, Horologium. Many subsequent refinements, even prior to Newton’s gravity, were made to this original design. (CHRISTIAN HUYGENS, 1658)

All of these innovations had been made prior to 1700: a remarkable set of advances in a short amount of time. The major known “source of error” that occurred with these pendulum clocks was due to temperature changes: the length of the pendulum would increase or decrease as the materials they were made out of expanded or contracted with temperature. By developing a temperature-compensated pendulum — where the period of a swing didn’t change even as the temperature did — pendulum clocks could be accurate to within just a few seconds per week. The first American-built clock wouldn’t occur for many decades after that advance, and so the first American timekeeping devices were imported.

Which is why it was such a puzzle when the first pendulum clock was brought from Europe to America. The clock, built and calibrated in the Netherlands, was exquisitely accurate. Sunset/sunrise and moonset/moonrise times were accurate for weeks, with stars rising and setting within a minute of the predicted time without any calibration for approximately a full month. But once that clock arrived in America, was wound, and began ticking, everything began to go wrong.

A journey from Europe to the Americas, in the 1600s, would have typically meant traveling from higher latitudes (closer to the pole) to lower, more equatorial latitudes. While this fact was generally appreciated back then, it wasn’t appreciated that the gravitational acceleration, and hence the period of a pendulum, would also be different. (© FREE MAP TOOLS / OPENSTREETMAP)

Within a single week, people noticed that the Sun and Moon weren’t rising or setting at the predicted times, according to this new clock. Moreover, the mismatch was getting worse with each passing day. Whereas the clock was supposed to be accurate — at the time — to within about 2 seconds per day, or about 15 seconds per week, it was running slow by more than 30 seconds per day. By the end of the first week, it was off by nearly 5 minutes.

Clearly, they concluded, the clock must have suffered some damage during the trans-Atlantic journey that was required to transport the clock from Europe to the Americas. So they did the only thing they knew how to do: they send the clock back to the manufacturer for repair. After another trans-Atlantic journey, where the clock was returned from the Americas to the Netherlands. When it arrived, they wound the clock, observed its ticking, and compared it to all the other ways they knew of to keep time: to other clocks, to sundials, and to the rising and setting of celestial objects.

To within 2 seconds per day, the clock was perfectly accurate.

A pendulum, so long as the weight is all in the bob at the bottom while air resistance, temperature changes, and large angle effects can be neglected, will always have the same period when subject to the same gravitational acceleration. The fact that the same pendulum swung at different rates in different locations was a hint towards Newton’s gravitation. (KRISHNAVEDALA / WIKIMEDIA COMMONS)

This maddening experience is familiar to anyone who’s ever been in a scenario where your car is doing something you know it shouldn’t be doing: making a funny sound, handling improperly, getting too hot, etc. You notice the problem, you take it to a mechanic, and as soon as you arrive at the mechanic, the car starts behaving as though nothing is wrong. The omnipresent problem that you’ve been experiencing constantly suddenly resolves itself when you arrive at the one person who could diagnose and fix it. Yet, as soon as you drive away, it inevitably starts having that problem again.

If they had send that clock back to the Americas from Europe, they would have seen exactly the same phenomena occur. The clock — which kept exquisitely accurate time in Europe — would have begun running at the wrong rate in the Americas once again. The reason would have been totally obscure to anyone living in the time of Galileo, but it began to make sense once we started to understand how gravitation worked.

In general, there are only two factors that determine the period of a pendulum: its length, where longer pendulums take longer to complete one oscillation, and the acceleration due to gravity, where larger amounts of gravity results in faster pendulum swings. (DANIEL A. RUSSELL / PENN STATE UNIVERSITY)

Here on Earth, the gravitational force is what drives the swinging of a pendulum. If you move a pendulum just a little bit away from its equilibrium position, the force of gravity is what pulls it back towards the equilibrium position. It’s true that the period of the pendulum is related to the length of the pendulum: if you want to double the period, you need to quadruple the length. (A pendulum that’s 0.994 meters long will take two seconds to return to its starting position; a pendulum that’s 0.2485 meters long will take 1 second to return to its starting position; one that’s 3.974 meters long will take 4 seconds to return to its starting position, etc.)

But we wrongly assumed, before Newton came along, that gravity worked the same way everywhere on the surface of the Earth. But the way gravitation works is that it attracts you to the center of the Earth, even as the entire mass of the planet attracts you. Because the Earth spins on its axis, it bulges at its equator and gets compressed at the poles. The effect is slight but still substantial, and it means that someone at one of Earth’s poles is closer to the center of the Earth than someone at the equator.

The diameter of the Earth at the equator is 12,756 km, while at the poles its only 12,714 km. You are 21 kilometers closer to the center of the Earth standing at the North Pole than you are at the equator. This difference is largely due to Earth’s axial rotation. (NASA / BLUE MARBLE PROJECT / MODIS)

If you’ve ever taken a physics class, you might have learned that all objects accelerate “downward” at 9.8 m/s² under the influence of gravity, meaning that if you drop an object from rest and neglect air resistance, then it will speed up, in the downward direction, by 9.8 m/s (about 32 feet per second) for every second that it falls. And that’s true! Anywhere you go, on the surface of Earth, will have that same acceleration downwards, towards Earth’s center: 9.8 m/s².

But it’s not still true if you go to the third significant figure: to what’s commonly cited as 9.81 m/s². At the poles, where you’re closest to Earth’s center, the gravitational acceleration is a little bit larger than average: 9.83 m/s². At the equator, where you’re farthest from Earth’s center, the gravitational acceleration is a bit smaller than average: 9.78 m/s². These effects are tiny, but over enough time, they’ll add up.

The gravitational field on Earth varies not only with latitude, but also with altitude and in other ways, particularly due to crustal thickness and the fact that the Earth’s crust effectively floats atop the mantle. As a result, the gravitational acceleration varies by a few tenths of a percent across Earth’s surface. (C. REIGBER ET AL. (2005), JOURNAL OF GEODYNAMICS 39(1),1–10)

Although we think of the most populated areas of Europe and North America to be at roughly the same latitudes, that’s not quite the case. Amsterdam, the most populous city in the Netherlands, is at 52° N latitude. Boston, which was the largest city as far north as it was in the Americas, is a full 10° farther south: at 42° N latitude. Other major population centers in the Americas were even further south, closer to the equator, exacerbating that difference.

Elevation changes can also make a difference, with lowland locations near the poles having the highest accelerations on Earth of up to 9.834 m/s², while high mountain ranges near the equator lead to the lowest measured acceleration: 9.764 m/s². However, the latitude problem is particularly important when it comes to timekeeping, and we can see this just by doing a simple calculation.

From their invention in 1656 until the 1920s, pendulum clocks were the most accurate timekeeping devices known to humanity. They eventually became inexpensive enough that most middle class homes had one during the industrial age, but each one needed to be properly calibrated for local conditions. (Photo by Colin McConnell/Toronto Star via Getty Images)

Let’s imagine that we’ve built a pendulum clock where the pendulum is exactly 0.994 meters in length: what’s known as a seconds pendulum. Each half-swing of the pendulum should take precisely 1 second, and since we know that there are 86,400 seconds in a 24 hour day, we know — in theory — how to measure a day. Here’s how well we’d do by measuring 43,200 swings of this pendulum, depending on our local value of Earth’s acceleration:

  • clock runs 1 minute 26 seconds fast, per day, for g = 9.83 m/s²,
  • clock runs 42 seconds fast, per day, for g = 9.82 m/s²,
  • clock runs 2 seconds slow, per day, for g = 9.81 m/s²,
  • clock runs 46 seconds slow, per day, for g = 9.80 m/s²,
  • clock runs 1 minute 30 seconds slow, per day, for g = 9.79 m/s²,
  • and the clock runs 2 minutes 14 seconds slow, per day, for g = 9.78 m/s².

Properly calibrating a pendulum clock — as we now know — means ensuring that it has the proper length for the gravitational acceleration at its particular location.

The design of an early pendulum clock, which was built in 1673 as his second design, by Christiaan Huygens, the inventor of the pendulum clock. The drawing is from his publication Horologium Oscillatorium, and includes a number of substantial improvements over his original illustrations that date back to 1658. Newton’s gravity would not be formulated until 1687. (CHRISTIAAN HUYGENS, 1673)

The pendulum clock, arguably, was the first experimental indication we had that gravity is not uniform over the surface of the Earth. Even before the advances of Isaac Newton, it was known that a pendulum — if the swing is small, the air resistance is negligible, and the temperature and length remain constant — always takes the same amount of time to complete a full swing. But the time it takes a pendulum to swing does vary over the surface of Earth, not only with length, but with two other factors: altitude and latitude.

Travel the Universe with astrophysicist Ethan Siegel. Subscribers will get the newsletter every Saturday. All aboard!

It was a major hint towards a fact that we now take for granted: that the gravitational attraction from Earth depends on your distance to our planet’s center, rather than being uniform over the entire surface. The fact that the Earth rotates on its axis, and that rotation causes the equator to bulge compared to the poles, means that a pendulum takes longer to complete an oscillation as gravity gets weaker. Any pendulum clock, therefore, must be calibrated to the gravitational field of exactly where you are. The first clock in the Americas was a spectacular demonstration of this effect, with the underlying cause being the law of gravity itself!

Ethan Siegel is the author of Beyond the Galaxy and Treknology. You can pre-order his third book, currently in development: the Encyclopaedia Cosmologica.


Up Next