Skip to content


Game theory analyzes projects, organizations, or negotiations as games where players pursue their interests under constraints, emphasizing the importance of understanding their motives, available options, and likely actions to effectively predict and respond to their moves.
In zero-sum negotiations, assess your opponent’s intelligence; if they are smarter, consider using a mixed strategy to act randomly or a minimax strategy to minimize potential losses, while being cautious not to misapply these tactics outside zero-sum contexts.
Game theorist Kevin Zollman emphasizes that many competitive situations can yield mutual benefits through trust and collaboration, urging negotiators to seek outcomes that favor both parties while ensuring enforceability to prevent broken promises.
Game theory, originating in economics, is the science of strategic thinking applicable to various fields, including biology and diplomacy, and is crucial for decision-making in all aspects of business, according to game theorist Kevin Zollman.
Restaurateur Will Guidara emphasizes that passionate disagreements can lead to innovation, advocating for empathy and collaboration by switching perspectives, seeking third options, or occasionally allowing one person to lead, to navigate conflicts effectively.
Psychological studies reveal that even infants possess a natural impulse to help others, highlighting the importance of reflective listening—an empathetic approach that prioritizes understanding over judgment, allowing individuals in distress to feel heard and supported.
Communities reflect the dynamics of the human family, where Michele Gelfand’s tight-loose framework helps navigate cultural conflicts and power struggles within households by identifying domains of conflict and establishing a balance between strict and flexible norms.
New parents often hesitate to communicate their evolving needs at work, but Lauren Smith Brody emphasizes that speaking up about flexible arrangements can enhance not only their own work-life balance but also benefit colleagues and overall company performance.
Robert Cialdini outlines three effective negotiation techniques: match your partner’s verbal style, pause before presenting your strongest point, and build trust by revealing a weakness before making your main argument, all of which can lead to more favorable outcomes.
To engage your audience effectively, psychologist Robert Cialdini suggests using “pre-suasion” to prime them with subtle cues, ensuring they are receptive to your stories and emotional appeals.
In this video lesson, former CIA operative Andrew Bustamante explains how strategically managing information can provide a competitive edge in the professional world, emphasizing the importance of trading secrets with a decreasing half-life to maintain influence and power.
In a video lesson, former CIA operative Andrew Bustamante explains how understanding people’s core motivators—through the RICE method—can inspire genuine action and build rapport, transforming motivation into a powerful tool for achieving results with integrity.
In a video lesson, former CIA operative Andrew Bustamante emphasizes the importance of sensemaking in negotiations, advocating for a gradual approach to build trust and overcome avoidance, ultimately leading to compliance and successful professional relationships.
In this video lesson, Chris Voss emphasizes that slowing down negotiations can lead to better outcomes by fostering effective communication, strategic concessions, and relationship-building, ultimately avoiding unproductive conversations and costly mistakes.
To gain the upper hand in negotiations without threatening the other party, use questions starting with “What” or “How” to create the illusion of their control, fostering empathy and clarity while establishing your limits gradually.
In negotiation, tone of voice significantly influences collaboration and outcomes, with expert Chris Voss highlighting techniques like mirroring and inflection, while emphasizing the critical role of the concept of “fairness” as both a strategic tool and a potential pitfall.
Successful negotiation focuses on collaboration for mutual benefit rather than simply achieving “yes,” with FBI negotiator Chris Voss advocating for starting with “no” to foster trust and open communication, ultimately leading to a more productive dialogue.
In negotiations, addressing and preemptively diminishing your counterpart’s negative emotions through tactical empathy—by acknowledging their fears and labeling their concerns—can shift focus from potential losses to positive outcomes, as explained by Chris Voss.
Negotiation styles—assertive, accommodating, and analytical—reflect our tendencies, and successful negotiators like Chris Voss advocate for blending these approaches to enhance interactions and outcomes, emphasizing the importance of tone and foresight in achieving mastery.
High-level negotiators, like former FBI agent Chris Voss, view negotiation as a science governed by consistent rules that anyone can learn to enhance their chances of achieving better deals, despite the inherent unpredictability of outcomes.
In this lesson, Dan Pink explains motivational interviewing by encouraging individuals to assess their interest and uncover personal reasons for their motivation, ultimately helping them identify obstacles and enhance their drive towards action.
Marketing professor Jonah Berger explains that expressing confidence, rather than hedging with uncertainty, enhances persuasion, as people are more likely to follow those who assertively communicate their ideas, while also advising when to appropriately express uncertainty.
Public speaker Mohammed Qahtani and marketing professor Jonah Berger emphasize the power of language, highlighting its role in communication and behavior prediction, while introducing Berger’s SPEACC Framework, which outlines six types of language that enhance communication effectiveness.
Ginni Rometty, former CEO of IBM, advocates for reconciling differences and co-creating a viable third option instead of compromising, emphasizing the importance of understanding both parties’ end goals and motivations through respectful debate.
The CIA’s “Red Team” during the Cold War exemplified strategic empathy by encouraging high-ranking officers to role-play adversaries, fostering humility and curiosity to enhance understanding and inform leadership decisions through an unorthodox analysis of emotions and perspectives.