Skip to content
Starts With A Bang

7 ways Earth would change if our Moon were destroyed

We take for granted how much the Moon does for Earth, but not all of the changes would be bad.

“If we get rid of the moon, women, those menstrual cycles are governed by the moon, will not get PMS. They will stop bitching and whining.” –Joe Scarborough, misattributing a quote to Arnold Schwarzenegger that was actually spoken by an impersonator

For nearly the entire 4.5 billion year history of our Solar System, the Earth hasn’t been alone while we revolve around the Sun. Our giant lunar companion is larger and more massive than any other moon when compared to the planet it orbits. When it’s in its full phase, it brightly illuminates the night, and the Moon has been linked throughout history to phenomena such as insanity (or lunacy), animal behavior (howling at the moon), farming (a harvest moon), and even women’s menstrual cycles. While those links don’t stand up to scientific scrutiny, there are many ways the Moon actually does affect the Earth. Destroying it would be a catastrophe, but would also change our world forever in some incredibly interesting ways.

Destroying the Moon would result in approximately 7 x 1⁰²² kilograms of debris, which hopefully wouldn’t hit Earth in large chunks. Image credit: Blind Spot Pictures Oy, 27 Films Production, New Holland Pictures, from the movie Iron Sky.

1.) Destroying the Moon would send debris to Earth, but it might not be life-exterminating. Imagine a weapon so deadly it could gravitationally unbind the Moon, blowing it apart. It would take a medium-sized asteroid’s worth of antimatter to do it (about a kilometer in diameter), and the debris would spread out in all directions. If the blast were weak enough, the debris would re-form into one or more new moons; if it were too strong, there would be nothing left; of just the right magnitude, and it would create a ringed system around Earth. Over time, those lunar fragments would de-orbit thanks to Earth’s atmosphere, creating a series of impacts.

A ringed system around Earth, which could occur if the Moon were destroyed in just the right way. Image credit: Wikimedia Commons user Grebenkov, as an add on to the work of Eugene Stauffer.

But these impacts wouldn’t be as destructive as the asteroids or comets we’re so afraid of today! Even though chunks of Moon would be massive, dense and even potentially larger than the asteroid that wiped out the dinosaurs, they would have a lot less energy. Asteroids or comets striking Earth move at twenty, fifty or even over a hundred kilometers-per-second, but lunar debris would be moving at a mere 8 km/s, and would strike only a glancing blow with our atmosphere. The debris striking Earth would still be destructive, but would impact our world with less than 1% the total energy of a comparably sized asteroid. If the chunks hitting us were small enough, humanity could easily survive.

The Bortle Dark Sky Scale, from 1–9, illustrating urban to pristine skies. A full Moon, incidentally, is bright enough that it can turn even a ‘1’ into a 7 (away from the Moon) to an 8 (nearby it) on its own. Image credit: International Dark Sky Association, 2008, using the free software Stellarium.

2.) The night sky would be naturally much brighter. Once the Moon and all its remnants were gone, the second-brightest object from Earth’s sky would be completely gone. While the Sun is naturally 400,000 times brighter than even the full, perigee Moon, the full Moon is again 14,000 times brighter than the next-brightest object in the sky: Venus. When you look at the Bortle Dark-Sky Scale, a full Moon can take you from a “1” — the most pristine, naturally dark sky possible — all the way up to a 7 or 8, washing out even bright stars. Without a Moon, there would be no natural impediments to pristine, dark skies every night of the year.

An illustration of the Sun-Moon-Earth configuration setting up a total solar eclipse. The Earth’s non-flatness means that the Moon’s shadow gets elongated when it’s close to the edge of the Earth. Image credit: Starry Night education software.

3.) Eclipses would be no more. Whether you’re talking solar eclipses — partial, total or annular — or lunar eclipses, where Earth’s natural satellite passes into our shadow, we would no longer have eclipses of any type. Eclipses require three objects to be aligned: the Sun, a planet and a planet’s moon. When the moon passes between the Sun and a planet, a shadow can be cast on the planet’s surface (total eclipse), the moon can transit across the Sun’s surface (annular eclipse), or it can obscure just a fraction of the Sun’s light (partial eclipse). But without a moon at all, none of these could occur. Our only natural satellite would never pass into Earth’s shadow if it didn’t exist, putting an end to eclipses.

The Moon exerts a tidal force on the Earth, which not only causes our tides, but causes braking of the Earth’s rotation, and a subsequent lengthening of the day. Image credit: Wikimedia Commons user Wikiklaas and E. Siegel.

4.) The length of a day would remain constant. You might not think about it much, but the Moon exerts a tiny frictional force on the spinning Earth, causing our rotation rate to slow down over time. We might only lose a second here or there over many centuries, but it adds up over time. Our 24 hour day was only 22 hours back when dinosaurs roamed the Earth, and was under 10 hours a few billion years ago. In another four million years, we won’t need leap days any longer in our calendar, as the rotation rate slows and the length of a day continues to get longer. But without a Moon, all that would cease. It would be 24 hour days every single day to come, until the Sun itself ran out of fuel and died.

Gorey Harbour at low tide, illustrating the extreme difference between high and low tide found in bays, inlets and other shallow, coastal regions here on Earth. Image credit: Wikimedia Commons user FoxyOrange.

5.) Our tides would be tiny. High tide and low tide presents an interesting, vast difference for those of us who live near the coast, particularly if we’re in a bay, sound, inlet, or other area where water pools. Our tides on Earth are primarily due to the Moon, with the Sun contributing only a small fraction of the tides we see today. During full moons and new moons, when the Sun, Earth and Moon are aligned, we have spring tides: the largest differences between high and low tide possible. When they’re at right angles, during a half Moon, we have neap tides: the smallest such differences. Spring tides are twice as large as neap tides, but without our Moon, the tides would always be the same paltry size, and only a quarter as big as today’s spring tides.

The obliquity of Earth’s axial tilt, currently 23.4 degrees, actually varies between 22.1 and 24.5 degrees. This is a very small variation compared to, say, Mars. Image credit: NASA, Wikimedia Commons user Mysid.

6.) Our axial tilt would be unstable. This is an unfortunate one. Earth spins on its axis, tilted at 23.4° with respect to our orbital plane around the Sun. (This is known as our obliquity.) You might not think the Moon has much to do with that, but over tens of thousands of years, that tilt changes: from as little as 22.1° to as much as 24.5°. The Moon is a stabilizing force, as worlds without big moons — like Mars — see their axial tilt change by ten times as much over time. On Earth, without a Moon, its estimated that our tilt would possibly even exceed 45° at times, making us a world that spun on our sides. Poles wouldn’t always be cold; the equator might not always be warm. Without our Moon to stabilize us, ice ages would preferentially hit different parts of our world every few thousand years.

And finally…

The Apollo mission trajectories, made possible by the Moon’s close proximity to us. Image credit: NASA’s Office of Manned Space Flight, Apollo missions.

7.) We would no longer have our stepping stone to the rest of the Universe. As far as we can tell, humanity is the only species ever to willfully put ourselves on the surface of another world. Part of why we were able to do that, from 1969 to 1972, is because of how close the Moon is to Earth. At only 380,000 km away, a conventional rocket can make the journey in approximately 3 days, and a round-trip signal at the speed of light takes only 2.5 seconds. The next closest options — Mars or Venus — take months to get there via rocket, over a year for a round trip, and many minutes for a round-trip communication.

We also never would have had any of the Moon landings. This is Buzz Aldrin setting up the Solar Wind experiment as part of Apollo 11. Image credit: NASA / Apollo 11.

The Moon is the easiest, most useful “practice run” we could have asked the Universe for if our goal was to explore the rest of the Solar System. Perhaps we’ll take advantage of it again — and all that it brings to Earth — someday soon.

This post first appeared at Forbes, and is brought to you ad-free by our Patreon supporters. Comment on our forum, & buy our first book: Beyond The Galaxy!


Up Next