Putin claims Russia has “invincible” nuclear weapons that can bypass U.S. defenses
President Vladimir Putin claimed in an annual state of the nation speech Thursday that the Russian military had developed new weaponry that renders missile defenses “completely useless.”
Addressing the Russian parliament for nearly two hours in a venue just outside the Kremlin, Putin outlined several new weapons: cruise missiles, underwater drones, and a hypersonic missile that can travel several times the speed of sound.
All of the weapons are reportedly nuclear-powered, a feature that would significantly extend the range of the missiles. The new hypersonic cruise missile would be able to carry a nuclear warhead and fly “with a practically unlimited range and an unpredictable flight path, which can bypass lines of interception and is invincible in the face of all existing and future systems of both missile defense and air defense,” Putin said.
The underwater drones could also launch a nuclear warhead from anywhere in the world.
“Means to resist them simply don’t exist in the world today,” Putin said of the underwater drones.
His speech was accompanied by graphics that showed how the weapons could theoretically bypass U.S. naval defense systems.
Graphic displayed during Putin’s speech.
Russian lawmakers applauded after being shown videos of the weapons.
Putin’s claims are hard to verify. But if Russia had been testing nuclear-powered weapons, there should theoretically be evidence of it, as Reuter’s Gerry Doyle noted on Twitter.
it strikes me that if russia really did test a nuclear-powered cruise missile, and they have not figured out a way to keep it from spraying radioactive particles, there should be some atmospheric traces
— Gerry Doyle (@mgerrydoyle) March 1, 2018
But it’s possible the U.S. has already detected those traces, as Philip Bump implied in an article for the Washington Post:
“Interestingly, recent news reports indicate that radioactive particles have been identified over northern Europe and Alaska.”
The Pentagon said it’s aware of Russian attempts to develop nuclear-powered missiles, but that missile tests had so far failed.
U.S. officials say Russia's nuke powered cruise missile not operational yet, still in 'R&D' phase and has crashed recently in testing in the Arctic, despite claims by Putin today.
— Lucas Tomlinson (@LucasFoxNews) March 1, 2018
Putin’s chest-thumping comes just weeks before Russia’s presidential election on March 18, which he is expected to win. It would mark his fourth term in office.
The Russian president has run a platform that emphasizes his strength and military prowess, a message that was driven home at the end of Thursday’s speech as Putin rose for the national anthem, a giant Russian flag appearing on a screen behind him. The idea: A vote for Putin is a vote for national security, as the BBC noted.
Putin’s speech could also be viewed in the context of President Trump’s recent unveiling of the Nuclear Posture Review, a document that outlines plans to bolster and expand the U.S. nuclear arsenal. In his State of the Union speech, Trump said he intends to build an arsenal “so strong and powerful that it will deter any acts of aggression.”
This likely made it easy for Putin to frame his country’s move as a response to U.S. weapons development. But experts say Russia has been expanding its nuclear capabilities for years.
In 2001, President George W. Bush withdrew from the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty that the U.S. had signed with the then-U.S.S.R. Putin said the withdrawal was a “mistake,” and, some claim, he’s been fuming about the decision ever since.
“This is more about Bush’s decision to withdraw from the ABM treaty and the failure of either Bush or Obama to address Russian concerns about missile defense than it is about [the Nuclear Posture Review],” said Jeffrey Lewis of the Middlebury Institute to the Washington Post.
Still, it’s easy to interpret parts of Putin’s speech on Thursday as being marked with resentment toward the West, which he said had been “ignoring us. Nobody listened to us. Well listen to us now.”
It remains unclear how much of Putin’s tough talk is true.
“Nobody knows how much is bluster,” Richard Aboulafia, vice president of analysis at Teal Group, an aerospace and defense consultancy, told CNN.
